What do christians believe about dinosaurs

More than this, the Creation Museum offers a window into the ideas and workings of the American religious right. A majority of them think the Bible should be read literally and that evolution is false.

The Creation Museum, about which we wrote a book in , promotes a very specific version of this belief, which holds that God made the universe in six hour days about 6, years ago. The first four chapters of the book of Genesis tell the story of Adam and Eve, who were created on the sixth day and given two jobs: to obey God and populate the Earth. When they disobeyed God and ate fruit from the tree of knowledge, they were banished from the Garden of Eden and became mortal.

Adam and Eve did better on their second assignment, though. According to Genesis, humans eventually became wicked and violent. In response, God sent a global flood that drowned everyone on the planet; the Creation Museum says the dead numbered in the billions. The King James Bible was first printed in But in the Old Testament, it is replete with descriptions of actual real living, breathing creatures.

And dragons are mythological. In practically every culture you hear stories about mythological creatures called dragons. Some would like to believe they were real. It just seems there are too many of these theories out there to really refute that perhaps these were real. Would you agree with that?

I would agree with that percent. And that was one of my starting points. That is, your Chinese dragon is so similar to your European dragon. It was the bronze sculpture from China. They were separated from each other by the Pacific Ocean. These cultures were not e-mailing each other their ideas back then. Now, if they are completely mythological, how in the world did that happen? And then on top of that is that they match, they match kind of a theropod.

They have a bi-pedaled stance. They have short forearms, elongated neck, with dermal spines. It looks like the theropod. And so not only do they match each other, they match with fossils of dinosaurs. Is there any one that you think more compelling than the others? In Revelation, 13 times it refers to Satan or anti-Christ, beast, to dragon. All right. If dragons are mythological with no bearing on reality, then God just compared the deceiver of the world, the murderer from the beginning, Satan, to a mythological, make believe creature.

However, no definitive scientific understanding of the universe exists before the big bang, as there is no way to scientifically explore that era. For the time span just beyond the first fraction of a second after the big bang, cosmologists are confident that they know rather well how the universe developed subsequently, including the formation of our solar system and Earth.

During the course of cosmic advancement, objects on the scale of our solar system formed approximately 5 billion years ago, our planet 4. How the first self-replicating molecules meaning molecules associated with life formed remains an unsolved puzzle. For about a half-century a number of theoretical schemes along with experimental work have been directed toward trying to answering this question, with no clear satisfactory solution as yet. Scientists who are actively pursuing biological research are confident that for the time period beginning after the appearance of life on Earth, contemporary evolutionary science gives a good account for the development of life up to the present time.

Many Christians who conclude that evolutionary science correctly describes how God has brought about and continues to uphold the created order refer to this entire package as evolutionary creation. This is in contrast to evolution advocates who maintain an atheistic religious position.

It is important to note that evolutionary science does not imply an atheistic worldview, or for that matter, a theistic worldview. Evolutionary science is neutral or agnostic in regards to metaphysical implications; it is a naturalistic endeavor in scientific method only.

As a result, Christians who find evolutionary science to be an accurate description of how life has developed on Earth are quick to point out that evolution is the mechanism by which God has brought about the wonderfully diverse life we now observe on his Earth, and they maintain that this mechanism is well described by contemporary biological science.

For example, the optical model of the nucleus represents the nucleus of an atom as a partially opaque crystal ball, since there are at least three nuclear phenomena that behave like a beam of light shining on a partially cloudy crystal ball. A scientific model is a first attempt at correlating diverse scientific data with the goal of eventually formulating a higher-level understanding of the phenomena in terms of a theory.

A scientific theory encompasses a more comprehensive set of phenomena than does a model. The scientific use of the term theory does not imply a guess or a scientific shot in the dark. Rather, it is a scientific shorthand designation representing the correlation of a large and diverse set of data related to a broad topic.

To designate a scientific description as a theory implies a powerful idea and understanding. Hence, to refer to contemporary neo-Darwinism or evolution as a theory implies that it is the reigning paradigm and undoubtedly the beginning point of any further research in this particular field of study. The theories in physics include the electromagnetic theory by Maxwell s , quantum theory s , relativity theory early 20th century, Einstein , and in biology the neo-Darwin theory of evolution, each of which gives scientific understanding to a wide swath of phenomena, and each of which is held in high esteem by the scientific community.

The laws of science are short statements that usually refer to a more restricted phenomenon or idea but on which there is universal acceptance.

A law summarizes data and many times refers to something that is thought to be invariable. The second law of thermodynamics, when stated correctly, is consistent with all known phenomena.

The law of conservation of energy is another example. As a result, when people ask whether evolution is a fact or only a theory, they display some misunderstanding.

The theory of evolution, implying a scientifically comprehensive understanding of a huge and diverse amount of biological data, and not simply a guess or a shot in the dark. Designating the scientific understanding of biological processes as a theory implies that this understanding has a very high vote of confidence with those scientists working to understand these processes. If I ever developed a scientific understanding of the nucleus that is referred to by the nuclear physics community as the Carlson Theory of the Nucleus, I would be very proud and pleased.

I, however, continue to wait. In sum, evolutionary theory correlates, systematizes, and interprets an enormous array of biological data facts related to the development of life on the Earth into a coherent and small set of principles that account for these data in an elegant way. And this is called the theory of evolution or neo-Darwinism. Biologists working in this field will be greatly surprised if current evolutionary thought is replaced by any scientific theory that is significantly different.

Of course, this is entirely possible. No scientific theory is percent certain. It is said of scientists that, if they marry a scientific theory, they may someday find themselves to be a widow or a widower. Microevolution and macroevolution are different, but they involve essentially the same processes. Microevolution refers to small changes in species due to the processes of evolution that accumulate over relatively short periods of time up to a few centuries within a population.

These changes allow a given species to adapt to changes in its environment, and have been observed in numerous instances. Macroevolution is major evolutionary change at the species level or higher, resulting in the formation of new species.

In one sense speciation and microevolution are different processes in that speciation often requires the new species to have some type of isolation from its parent group in order to keep the new species distinct. Apart from this, speciation requires no processes other than what is found in microevolution. The theory of evolution is an advanced scientific model, currently at the status of a theory see the previous discussion of model and theory , whose goal is to explain mechanisms of the development of life on the Earth over a long history, and it does so in terms of common ancestry and descent with change.

Evolutionism or naturalism is a philosophical attempt to extrapolate from the scientific theory of evolution to support the atheistic claim that there is no Creator God or any special significance to human life, and therefore no creation of humanity in the image of God. Whereas Christians are divided over whether to support the scientific theory of evolution, no Christian will support the atheistic philosophical system of evolutionism.

Central to the science of evolution is a great expanse of time. The evolutionary idea of life on Earth developing from the most primitive and simple form to where it is in its magnificent and diverse character throughout our Earth requires time—over hundreds of millions of years, even billions of years.

The historical sciences of cosmology and geophysics have used over a dozen independent strategies by which to determine the ages of the universe and Earth. Scientists throughout the world have worked on these problems and have determined both ages with a claimed uncertainty of less than 1 percent.

If these results are reliable and my conclusion is most likely that they are , the bottom line is that the universe and Earth are billions of years old, When do Christians believe dinosaurs went extinct then? The two possibilities are either before or after the flood. Some Christians believe that dinosaurs went extinct before or during the flood because the flood was the only thing that could wipe out their kind.

From the effects of the flood, many fossils of dinosaurs have been found all over the world. After all, how could you fit a T-Rex and a full-blown brachiosaurus on the ark? Well, Noah could have easily brought baby dinosaurs or younger dinosaurs on the ark instead of adults. This way, dinosaurs would have survived the flood along with every other kind of animal. Most Christians would say that dinosaurs went extinct sometime after the flood.

They believe this because God clearly commanded Noah to bring two of every creature of the sky and ground on the ark. You are to bring into the ark two of all living creatures, male and female, to keep them alive with you. Two of every kind of bird, of every kind of animal, and of every kind of creature that moves along the ground will come to you to be kept alive.