What was cut from human centipede 2

The generally enthusiastic opening night crowd at Fantastic Fest seemed, well, pretty bored with Tom Six's latest homage to the human rectum. Several of the more nauseating moments, specifically the rape scene, were met with mild exclamations of revulsion from audience members, but overall the pervading mood in the room was that of simple boredom.

This is an audience that championed films like Martyrs, A Serbian Film, and yes The Human Centipede, but the ceaseless deluge of bodily functions starts to feel less like a confrontational film and more like the project of a poop-obsessed year-old. Those who didn't dismiss the film seemed to detest it. Although you will find some positive reviews on the net, trust me.

Nobody could copy the unrealistic stupidity on display here. Having said that I'd also assert that hardcore pornography would be healthier for a child than what's offered in Centipede II. At least a quick parent could explain to a child what sex is. The film also contains scenes of sexual and sexualised violence, most notably a sequence in which Martin rapes the woman at the end of his 'centipede'.

He is shown thrusting into the naked woman. The film also features graphic sight of a pregnant woman's waters breaking and the woman subsequently giving birth.

It also features extensive male and female nudity, verbal references to sexual abuse and paedophilia, strong sex references, strong and very strong language, and discriminatory language. Company was required to make 32 individual cuts to scenes of sexual and sexualised violence, sadistic violence and humiliation, and a child presented in an abusive and violent context. In this case, cuts included: a man masturbating with sandpaper around his penis; graphic sight of a man's teeth being removed with a hammer; graphic sight of lips being stapled to naked buttocks; graphic sight of forced defecation into and around other people's mouths; a man with barbed wire wrapped around his penis raping a woman; a newborn baby being killed; graphic sight of injury as staples are torn away from individuals' mouth and buttocks.

There is little attempt to portray any of the victims in the film as anything other than objects to be brutalised and degraded for the amusement and sexual arousal of the main character and for the pleasure of the viewer. There is a strong and sustained focus throughout the work on the link between sexual arousal and sexual violence and a clear association between non-consensual pain and sexual pleasure.

In making a decision as to whether a video work is suitable for classification, the BBFC applies the criteria set out in its Classification Guidelines.

The film is full of blood and torture which is not really mitigated by converting to black and white. Overview of the different versions: In the following segment, we're trying to show you - as far as possible chronologically - the individual releases of the movie. Great Britain. You don't really notice the cut since the "framing" shot of Martin is shown in one piece. Then you see the girl nervously looking around.

Then you see Martin standing behind the centipede a little earlier. The rest of this shot was edited with dark flickering so that you can't really see the barbwire.

Here you can see a comparison, however, the brightness varies throughout the scene. After that you see Martin behind the centipede - he's already on his knees.

In the uncut version you actually see a long shot and the shot of Martin behind the centipede begins a little earlier.

He goes down on his knees. Uncut 4. It trims the shot down to half a second the scene sort of runs in fast motion and is vaguely visible. Normally the scene runs with regular speed and you see some saliva coming out of Martin's mouth.

After that you see Rachel screaming. The person in front - Ian - looks tormented. While I doubt that any amount of editing will make Human Centipede 2 feel safe or clean — this is a movie about a madman who attaches his victims ass-to-mouth in a chain — two minutes and 37 seconds is nothing to shrug at.

According to the New York Times via Movies. Of course, it's not as though U.